AI Coding Rules Rollout Playbook for Engineering Teams
How to ship AI coding standards across a real team without killing velocity or creating policy theater.
Why most rollouts fail
Most teams over-index on the document and under-invest in adoption mechanics. A long rules file is not a process. If developers don’t know when rules apply, where they live, and how exceptions are handled, compliance drops in week two.
Phase 1: Define one source of truth
Pick one source file per assistant and keep ownership clear:
- Cursor: `.cursorrules`
- Claude Code: `CLAUDE.md`
- Copilot: `.github/copilot-instructions.md`
Store policy rationale next to the rule, not in a separate wiki. Engineers should understand why a constraint exists.
Phase 2: Start with high-leverage rules only
Start with 8-15 rules max. Good starter categories:
- API contracts and typing discipline
- Error handling conventions
- Test expectations for changed code
- Security defaults (no hardcoded secrets, input validation)
Avoid style-only bikeshedding in v1. Teams adopt guardrails that prevent incidents, not preference debates.
Phase 3: Add enforcement that helps, not blocks
Use CI to check predictable constraints: lint, typecheck, test coverage floors on touched files. Keep AI rules aligned with CI checks so engineers see one system, not conflicting signals.
Phase 4: Measure behavior
Track:
- PR rework rate after AI-generated commits
- Security/static analysis findings per PR
- Time-to-merge by team
If a rule does not improve one of these metrics, rewrite or remove it.
Practical rollout cadence
Run a 30-day rollout:
- Week 1: baseline and pilot team
- Week 2: ship v1 standards
- Week 3: collect friction and tune
- Week 4: org-wide template + training snippets
This is enough to establish habit without waiting for a perfect framework.